Chris Browne wrote:
> tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) writes:
> > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> >> I think pg_indent has to be made a lot more portable and easy to use
> >> before that can happen :-) I've run it once or twice on linux machines,
> >> and it comes out with huge changes compared to what Bruce gets on his
> >> machine.
> >
> > Yeah, I've had no luck with it either.
> >
> > Every so often there are discussions of going over to GNU indent
> > instead. Presumably that would solve the portability problem.
> > The last time we tried it (which was a long time ago) it seemed
> > to have too many bugs and idiosyncrasies of its own, but it would
> > be worth a fresh round of experimenting IMHO.
>
> Well, GNU indent is now on version 2.2.9, and has evidently addressed
> *some* problems with it.
>
> Unfortunately, the pgindent README does not actually specify what any
> of the actual problems with GNU indent are, thus making it pretty much
> impossible to evaluate whether or not any of the subsequent releases
> might have addressed any of those problems.
>
> I doubt that the pgindent issues have been addressed.
What I did was to run pgindent on the source tree, make a copy, then run
GNU indent on it and diff -r. I can try that test again in the next few
months.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
