Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> No, changing that wasn't what I meant to suggest. My point here is that
> >> we'd dropped a number of big mushy discussions into the queue with the
> >> idea that they'd be re-opened during commit fest, but new discussion
> >> did not happen to any useful extent. Conclusion: don't bother putting
> >> anything less concrete than a patch on the fest queue.
>
> > So when/how do those discussions get resolved?
>
> [ shrug... ] You can't force ideas to happen on a schedule.
>
> If you don't want an issue to get forgotten, then make a TODO entry for
> it. But the purpose of commit fest is to make sure we deal with things
> that can be dealt with in a timely fashion. It's not going to cause
> solutions to unsolved problems to appear from nowhere.
I need is to know if they are ideas worthy of TODO.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
