Re: modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Aidan Van Dyk |
---|---|
Subject | Re: modules |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20080405002251.GC6497@yugib.highrise.ca Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: modules (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: modules
Re: modules Re: modules |
List | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [080404 16:12]: > And utterly, utterly insecure. > > The fact that the referenced object file is a "trusted" Postgres module > isn't enough to make it safe --- the user can still play hob with the > system by creating functions with the wrong argument/result types, > pointing at exported symbols that weren't meant to be callable > functions, creating broken index opclasses from the functions, etc. So those are all good reasons why we can't just assume a obj_file "safe" to be used for a C language function with the current framework. Would a stronger "contract" mechanism between PG and symbols loaded from object files used for functions... Today was the first time I actually ever looked at the create function and create language code, and I'm actually suprised at how little "contract" there seems to be between a object file and the created function. But since it's always been guarded by super-user, it's obviously not been an issue... > I think you'd need to move the security gating up a level, and somehow > see the SQL-language installation and deinstallation scripts as trusted. > This goes back to the question of what is a module anyway. And, unfortunately, I haven't seen any of those who have a thorough enough knowledge and understanding of the whole system and security issues talking a whole lot about that, well, beside shooting gaping holes through lame ideas like mine ;-) Maybe it's just because the problem really *is* that hard. But I've seen some pretty amazing features come in to PG over the past years, so I know hard problems are solved by you guys... Unfortunately, the current state really does seem to mean that the "feature of modularity" really is the kiss of death, since things are actively pushed out from core to be modular projects, making them unusable for most people... > Like Andrew, I'm a bit disturbed that people feel free to propose to > implement this stuff when they evidently have read none of the prior > discussions. Well, I'm happy to go back to lurking for now... Maybe after a few years I'll have heard and seen more discussions and know better next time ;-) -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, aidan@highrise.ca command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
pgsql-hackers by date: