Re: modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From D'Arcy J.M. Cain
Subject Re: modules
Date
Msg-id 20080404203303.e90b7967.darcy@druid.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: modules  (Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>)
Responses Re: modules  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:22:51 -0400
Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca> wrote:
> Unfortunately, the current state really does seem to mean that the
> "feature of modularity" really is the kiss of death, since things are
> actively pushed out from core to be modular projects, making them
> unusable for most people...

Is there anything but anecdotal evidence for this statement?  I mean,
yes, some ISPs will make life hard for their users and some <SHAMELESS
PLUG "http://www.Vex.Net/" /> will work with their clients to deliver
what they need.  Besides, most users of PostgreSQL are probably
enterprise users or users running off of their own systems who have all
the access they need. How big is this "problem" really?

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net>         |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aidan Van Dyk
Date:
Subject: Re: modules
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement current_query(), that shows the currently executing