Re: code cleanup of timestamp code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: code cleanup of timestamp code
Date
Msg-id 20080226093707.GB14945@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to code cleanup of timestamp code  ("Warren Turkal" <turkal@google.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:22:03AM -0800, Warren Turkal wrote:
> As a result, I have a few questions about the timestamp code. In what
> instances is the floating point timestamp recommended? I see that
> Debian and Ubuntu ship packages that use the int64 timestamps. Is the
> backend smart enough to not load and use a database with timestamp
> fields created with the representation not compiled into the compiler?
> And finally, would this work be welcome in PostgreSQL? I view is as a
> kind of beginner janitor type of project to get my feet wet.

AIUI it's because there are systems that have broken 64-integer
support. Or at least, that's the theory. There was a question recently
to check if there really are such systems still running...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
>  -- John F Kennedy

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq.rc make rule
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Link postgres from all object files at once, to avoid the