Re: libpq.rc make rule - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: libpq.rc make rule
Date
Msg-id 20080226092604.GD528@svr2.hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq.rc make rule  ("Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:15:05AM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Dave Page wrote:
> >  > Yes, because newer builds may be linked against updated runtime
> >  > versions. We need to be sure the installer will upgrade the file so it
> >  > definitely matches any runtimes (or other dependencies) that we're
> >  > also installing/upgrading.
> >
> >  If it is so very important to update this file for every build, why are we
> >  shipping it in the distribution tarball, which is done under the assumption
> >  that it never has to be updated?  Something doesn't fit here.
> 
> That I can't answer.

It is to make it possible to build libpq "the old way" using nmake or
borland c++ - not requiring mingw or the perl stuff in src/tools/msvc.

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Batch update of indexes on data loading
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: code cleanup of timestamp code