Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?
Date
Msg-id 20080.1257432708@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Did we get the keyword from anyplace? Is it an Oracleism or MSSQLism
> or anything?

Hmm, that is a good question.  I had assumed it was an Oracle-ism,
but it doesn't seem to be described anywhere in my copy of the PL/SQL
manual (which is a bit old but newer than plpgsql...)  I dunno where
Jan got it from.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints