Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?
Date
Msg-id 4AF2F57B.6090609@Yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/5/2009 9:51 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
>> Did we get the keyword from anyplace? Is it an Oracleism or MSSQLism
>> or anything?
> 
> Hmm, that is a good question.  I had assumed it was an Oracle-ism,
> but it doesn't seem to be described anywhere in my copy of the PL/SQL
> manual (which is a bit old but newer than plpgsql...)  I dunno where
> Jan got it from.

And I don't remember why it was necessary or seemed like a good idea.


Jan

-- 
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither
liberty nor security. -- Benjamin Franklin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Erik Aronesty
Date:
Subject: using pg_comparator as replication
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints