Re: operator exclusion constraints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: operator exclusion constraints
Date
Msg-id 20174.1257432981@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: operator exclusion constraints  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: operator exclusion constraints
Re: operator exclusion constraints
Re: operator exclusion constraints
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Ooh, that's kind of neat.  But I think you'd need EXCLUSIVE (a, b) BY
> (=, =), since it could equally well be EXCLUSIVE (a, b) BY (=, &&).

Yeah, we definitely want some parentheses delimiting the expression.
EXCLUSIVE still feels like the wrong part-of-speech though.  How
about EXCLUDING (...) BY ... instead?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Shall we just get rid of plpgsql's RENAME?
Next
From: Rafael Martinez
Date:
Subject: Re: ident changes between 8.3 and 8.4