Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I don't think people are going to volunteer to remove just their name
> but they might agree to remove them all. As a contributor I personally
> would have no problem with that.
I would.
> I am actually a little worried that companies who sponsor developers
> might some day want their company name on the release note item. I am
> glad we have not had to make that decision yet.
Yeah, I think companies have no place in a listing like that. Companies
don't do any work. People do. If sponsoring companies want to be in a
list, let them be on a separate list that's explicitely for sponsors.
I kinda hate the fact that people is now so used to the concept that
companies are "people" and have much of the same "rights". It is
absurd.
> Also, the release notes often just attribute items to just a first name,
> so in some way that name has to be related to the developer profiles to
> know who "Tom" or "Simon" is.
Yeah, I don't know when did that start but I would prefer that the names
would be spelled in full. On the other hand, having a first name only
is a kind of a sign that you're already an established developer. Still
I would like my last name to be there and I was considering adding it
myself.
> The bottom line is that the release notes for not for attribution, but
> we do attribute if the item appears on the release notes. This seems
> like the best balance, though it is unfair in failing to attribute work
> to many contributors.
Yeah. In my opinion, we're not really looking for 100% fairness. I
think credit is important, so if Stefan Kaltenbrunner did some psql
autocomplete work and it's not attributed, let's add a note to that
effect. There is no point in saying exactly how many lines he
contributed, nor listing the exact changes he did, though.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvherre/
"No deja de ser humillante para una persona de ingenio saber
que no hay tonto que no le pueda enseñar algo." (Jean B. Say)
