Re: autovacuum process blocks without reporting a deadlock - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: autovacuum process blocks without reporting a deadlock
Date
Msg-id 20071127141416.GA7332@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovacuum process blocks without reporting a deadlock  ("Thomas Chille" <thomas@chille.de>)
Responses Re: autovacuum process blocks without reporting a deadlock  ("Thomas Chille" <thomas@chille.de>)
List pgsql-general
Thomas Chille wrote:

> I think this are the relevant pg_locks entries:
>
> relation        75685778        75686189
>                          9017862     25467   AccessShareLock f
> relation        75685778        75686189
>                          9009323     9317    ShareUpdateExclusiveLock
>       t
> relation        75685778        75686189
>                          9009312     9293    AccessShareLock t
> relation        75685778        75686189
>                          9009312     9293    RowExclusiveLock        t
> relation        75685778        75686189
>                          9009312     9293    AccessExclusiveLock     f
> relation        75685778        75686189
>                          9012978     28370   AccessShareLock f
>
> 75686189 is the table hst_timerecording. for me it looks like the
> autovacuum is not releasing the blocking ShareUpdateExclusiveLock?

What are the column headings?  I find this difficult to read.

Please post the whole of pg_locks.  I may be missing something but I
think we're missing part of the picture here.  Autovacuum does not seem
to be locking on anything.

--
Alvaro Herrera                 http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/CTMLCN8V17R4
One man's impedance mismatch is another man's layer of abstraction.
(Lincoln Yeoh)

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas Chille"
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum process blocks without reporting a deadlock
Next
From: Fernando Xavier
Date:
Subject: Connection idle broken