-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 19:51:03 -0000
"Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org> wrote:
> > Your suggestion implies that instead of doing this publicly a www
> > team cabal should decide this in some back room and not inform
> > anyone of it.
> >
>
> You have some proof they're doing anything inappropriate? Confident a
> judge would accept it if they sued for damage to their reputation and
> loss of potential business by allegations made in a public forum?
>
Well let's start at the top. Has *anyone* bothered to contact the party
and just talk to them? See what is going on? A lot of this seems it may
be circumspect.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
> Regards, Dave
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading
> through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command
> to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to
> the mailing list cleanly
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHLivjATb/zqfZUUQRAnmHAJ9LcgFj+eJvVwIDdkSmNw/6n85yqgCfbFG9
FASV2voDD28w8nYNOBqkqmw=
=vQ3+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
