Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case

From: Dave Page
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case
Date: ,
Msg-id: 472E4793.3010504@postgresql.org
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan)
Responses: Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan)
List: pgsql-www

Tree view

Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Robert Treat, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Robert Treat, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Magnus Hagander", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Magnus Hagander, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Simon Riggs, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Peter Eisentraut, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Magnus Hagander, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Magnus Hagander, )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Kevin Hunter, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
          Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
           Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
          Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
           Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
            Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
             Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
             Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
              Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
            Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
             Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
              Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
               Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
                Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
                 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
          Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Bruce Momjian, )
          Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
           Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
            Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
             Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
             Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (, )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Kris Jurka, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Kris Jurka, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )

Chander Ganesan wrote:
> I think perhaps not.  We already have course titles...and vendors
> consistently use the same name for their courses.  We could simply take
> the course names, their counts, and when the most recent of any
> particular group of courses (start date) is.  Then list the three most
> recent (in terms of start date) along with a count as to the number of
> times they are offered...
> 
> Like: Upcoming courses:
> 
> PostgreSQL Administration (14 events)
> PostgreSQL Cool Tricks and Stuff (3 events)
> PostgreSQL for Dummies (1 event)
> plus 4 Other events...
> 
> If you can send me some DDL I can write up a sample query...

Well thats not exactly the same as was originally suggested, and in fact
does little more than to force events to be grouped by what could easily
be minor differences in phrasing:

PostgreSQL Administration for Beginners (3 events)
PostgreSQL Administration 101 (5 events)
Getting started with PostgreSQL (2 events)
Beginning PostgreSQL (4 events).

If we want to do something like that it needs to be done properly by
(for example) pre-defining some set categories to ensure we list things
appropriately.

Regards, Dave.



pgsql-www by date:

From: Chander Ganesan
Date:
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case