clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?
Date
Msg-id 200708020758.45997.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?
List pgsql-hackers
All,

Through the User Concurrency Thread on -performance [1], Tom and Jignesh found
that our proximate bottleneck on SMP multi-user scaling is clog_buffers.
Increasing clog_buffers to 64 improved this scaling by 30% per Jignesh:

===================

8.3+ HOT = did not defer more from 8.2 Numbers and hit the CLOG problem
at 1100 users (instead of 1000 for 8.2)

8.3 + HOT + CLOG = Got a 1350 users peak of 137364 txn  and it held
steady till 1450 before it started dropping..

The Best 8.2 +CLOG patch is at 1250user at 128638 txn.. which at the
same users in 8.3 did 131265.. So per user transactions also seems to
have improved.. Good but roughly 2% at same user count.. But peak value
in terms of scalability the improvement is 6.7%

Pristine 8.2 could do about 950 users at 100828 txn: So at same user
transactions 8.3+HOT+CLOG gives about  102058 txn =  1.2% while in terms
of scalability throughput we get a huge boost of 36.2%

So if we get the CLOG patch integrated in 8.3+HOT+CLOG release then
overall the gain from our pristine 8.2.4 release will be about  36%  out
of the box ....

===================

So:

1) Is there any potential negative impact to increasing the number of CLOG
buffers?

2) Is this a small enough change that we can make it during beta?

---Josh

[1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-07/msg00237.php

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: .NET driver
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?