Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?
Date
Msg-id 12001.1186070898@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Through the User Concurrency Thread on -performance [1], Tom and
> Jignesh found that our proximate bottleneck on SMP multi-user scaling
> is clog_buffers.

I don't actually think that what Jignesh is testing is a particularly
realistic scenario, and so I object to making performance decisions on
the strength of that one measurement.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?