Home > mailing lists

Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From	Josh Berkus
Subject	Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?
Date	August 2, 2007 16:34:40
Msg-id	200708020935.28823.josh@agliodbs.com Whole thread Raw
In response to	Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses	Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?
List	pgsql-hackers

Tree view

Tom,

> I don't actually think that what Jignesh is testing is a particularly
> realistic scenario, and so I object to making performance decisions on
> the strength of that one measurement.

What do you mean by "not realistic"?  What would be a realistic scenario?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: Tom Lane
Date: 02 August 2007, 16:08:27
Subject: Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?

From: Tom Lane
Date: 02 August 2007, 16:50:23
Subject: Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?

Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Previous

Next