Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?
Date
Msg-id 200708020935.28823.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> I don't actually think that what Jignesh is testing is a particularly
> realistic scenario, and so I object to making performance decisions on
> the strength of that one measurement.

What do you mean by "not realistic"?  What would be a realistic scenario?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?