Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>>> Hm, another possibility: "synchronous_commit = off"
>
> >>>> Ooo, I like that. Any other takers?
>
> >>> Yea, I like that too but I am now realizing that we are not really
> >>> deferring or delaying the "COMMIT" command but rather the recovery of
> >>> the commit. GUC as full_commit_recovery?
> >>
> >> recovery is a bad word I think. It is related too closely to failure.
>
> > commit_stability? reliable_commit?
>
> What's wrong with synchronous_commit? It's accurate and simple.
That is fine too.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
