Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>> Hm, another possibility: "synchronous_commit = off"
>>>> Ooo, I like that. Any other takers?
>>> Yea, I like that too but I am now realizing that we are not really
>>> deferring or delaying the "COMMIT" command but rather the recovery of
>>> the commit. GUC as full_commit_recovery?
>>
>> recovery is a bad word I think. It is related too closely to failure.
> commit_stability? reliable_commit?
What's wrong with synchronous_commit? It's accurate and simple.
regards, tom lane
