Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date
Msg-id 200706211438.55075.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent  (Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com>)
Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent  ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>)
Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent  (Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2007 00:38 schrieb Gregory Stark:
> > I think people are worried that an 'm' in one column might mean something
> > different than an 'm' in another column, and perhaps that is confusing.
>
> To whom? the person writing it?

If everyone around here had gotten their way we'd already be in a situation 
were you could write

log_rotation_age = 5m
log_rotation_size = 5m

And someone trained in the metric system would think, "What, five meters?".  
So it rotates when age and size are the same or what?  And the ultimate 
consequence of that thinking is that the PostgreSQL developers are uneducated 
dummies and clearly PostgreSQL cannot be a quality product if they can't even 
get that right.

So by all means add documentation and hints.

Btw.: I'm currently at DebConf in Edinburgh.  On Scottish motorway 
signage, "5m" means "five miles".  Even the Americans do that better.  So, 
no, you can't have "m" for "minutes". ;)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: What does Page Layout version mean? (Was: Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3)
Next
From: Brian Hurt
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent