Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brian Hurt
Subject Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date
Msg-id 467A7399.4010201@janestcapital.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:<br /><blockquote cite="mid200706211438.55075.peter_e@gmx.net" type="cite"><pre wrap="">Am
Donnerstag,21. Juni 2007 00:38 schrieb Gregory Stark: </pre><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><pre
wrap="">Ithink people are worried that an 'm' in one column might mean something
 
different than an 'm' in another column, and perhaps that is confusing.     </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">To whom?
theperson writing it?   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
 
If everyone around here had gotten their way we'd already be in a situation 
were you could write

log_rotation_age = 5m
log_rotation_size = 5m </pre></blockquote><br /> Would it be a bad idea to always support the multi-character
abbreviations? So the min, sec, hr, day, wk, mth, yr ar all, to my knowledge, unambiguous.  As are kb, mb, gb, tb.  So
theabove would be:<br /> log_rotation_age = 5min<br /> log_rotation_size = 5mb<br /> edinburgh_distance=5mi<br /><br />
Brian<br/> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent