Re: [Fwd: Re: Autovacuum keeps vacuuming a table disabled in pg_autovacuum] - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: [Fwd: Re: Autovacuum keeps vacuuming a table disabled in pg_autovacuum]
Date
Msg-id 20070604144717.GC16196@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Fwd: Re: Autovacuum keeps vacuuming a table disabled in pg_autovacuum]  (Ron St-Pierre <ron.pgsql@shaw.ca>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:34:13AM -0700, Ron St-Pierre wrote:
> What do you mean by this?  I wanted to do both a VACUUM ANALYZE and a
> VACUUM FULL, so ran VACUUM FULL ANALYZE. Is there something odd about
> VACUUM FULL, other than locking the table it's working on?

It tends to bloat indexes. Also, people tend to find that CLUSTER is
faster anyway.

If all you want is to avoid XID wraparound, an ordinary VACUUM will do
fine.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: what to do when pg_cancel_backend() doesnt work?
Next
From: Bohdan Linda
Date:
Subject: Re: High-availability