Re: High-availability - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bohdan Linda
Subject Re: High-availability
Date
Msg-id 20070604145138.GA10704@bafster.chello.upc.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: High-availability  (Chander Ganesan <chander@otg-nc.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:21:32PM +0200, Chander Ganesan wrote:
> I think you'll typically find that you can get one or the other -
> synchronous replication, or load balancing...but not both.  On the other

Hi,

I am in very similar position, but I am more failover oriented. I am
considering using pgcluster, which shall resolve both at the cost of
slight transaction overhead. Does anyone have any experience with this?
What problems may I expect in this setup?

Kind regards,
Bohdan

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Autovacuum keeps vacuuming a table disabled in pg_autovacuum]
Next
From: "Alexander Staubo"
Date:
Subject: Re: NULLS and User Input WAS Re: multimaster