OK, so the patch is ready to be applied?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NikhilS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I agree this will unnecessary add arguments to the DefineIndex API. If we
> > > stick to the patch's earlier way of converting the Oid to names for just
> > > these 2 arguments, we can avoid this IMO.
> > >
> > > Considering that we will be generating this information from existing
> > valid
> > > index information, I think converting the Oids to names is safe enough.
> > > Alvaro, do you think we should stick to the existing patch mechanism
> > then
> > > considering that it avoids polluting the API?
> >
> > Not sure. Is it possible that the schema is renamed while the operation
> > is being executed? If it's not then this not a problem at all so the
> > existing patch is fine.
>
>
> I doubt if accessMethod name will change. The tableSpace name can change,
> but the possibility is no worse to doing a [CREATE TABLE table_name ...
> TABLESPACE tablespace]. So this should be reasonably ok.
>
> Regards,
> Nikhils
> --
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
