Re: Vacuum-full very slow - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Vacuum-full very slow
Date
Msg-id 20070427131808.GE4645@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum-full very slow  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-general
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:13:13AM +0200, Listmail wrote:
> >     VACUUM FULL is slow because it plays with the indexes...
> >     CLUSTER is slow because it has to order the rows...
>
> And:
> VACUUM FULL has to seek/read/write all over the disk to get it's job
> done.
> CLUSTER can scan through the table linearly a few times and write out
> the result.
> Now it's true that sorting large files involves overflowing to disk,
> but that path has been pretty well optimised.

Hmm, no, CLUSTER doesn't scan the table linearly; it uses an indexscan,
so it also needs seek/read/seek/read/write.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jorge Godoy
Date:
Subject: Re: Converting time to float
Next
From: Rich Shepard
Date:
Subject: Preferred Installation/Data Directories