Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > I think that's incorrect information to the user :-(
> > > If the child terminates with exit(1), we will then say "child process
> > > was terminated by exception 1. This seems to be a bug", which is clearly
> > > not true.
> > >
> > > Unless you know a sure way of determining if the exitcode is a normal
> > > exitcode or an exception code.
> >
> > Current CVS believes values >= 0x100 are non-exit() terminations.
>
> Why does it do that :-) That's clearly wrong. There are plenty of
> exitcodes > 0x100 that aren't exceptions.
Please read include/port/win32.h comment section on this and then reply.
We only care about non-exit() exits.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
