Joachim Wieland wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 05:55:45PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > The idea of having to do this at every version number bump is pretty
> > > unappetizing. Shouldn't we fix things so that the version number
> > > doesn't appear in the ecpg regression files?
>
> > It would be nice, yea, or we can stip out that line when doing the diff.
>
> Attached is a patch that adds a --regression option to ecpg. I replaced the
> manual checking for long options (--version and --help) by a call to
> getopt_long(). Unfortunately I don't have access to a platform that does not
> support getopt_long, so maybe there is something missing for those platforms
> (including for Windows maybe).
>
> The other patch is against the expected/ directory to replace the version
> number with a fixed string.
I have added a checklist item to update the ecpg regression output for
major release bumps. I think that is the easiest solution at this
point.
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
