Re: database contest results

From: Peter Eisentraut
Subject: Re: database contest results
Date: ,
Msg-id: 200608291920.35159.peter_e@gmx.net
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: database contest results  (Jeff Davis)
Responses: Re: database contest results  (Jeff Davis)
List: pgsql-advocacy

Tree view

database contest results  (Lukas Kahwe Smith, )
 [ignore this and previous email] Re: database contest results  (Lukas Kahwe Smith, )
 Re: database contest results  (Hans-Juergen Schoenig, )
  Re: database contest results  (Andreas Pflug, )
   Re: database contest results  (Anastasios Hatzis, )
  Re: database contest results  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
  Re: database contest results  (Jeff Davis, )
   Re: database contest results  (Peter Eisentraut, )
    Re: database contest results  (Jeff Davis, )
     Re: database contest results  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
     Re: database contest results  (Jeff Davis, )
     Re: database contest results  (Andreas Pflug, )
      Re: database contest results  (Jeff Davis, )
       Re: database contest results  (Andreas Pflug, )
       Re: database contest results  (mdean, )
        Re: database contest results  (Josh Berkus, )
        Re: database contest results  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
        Re: database contest results  (Brian Hurt, )
 Re: database contest results  (Chris Browne, )
  Re: database contest results  (Andreas Pflug, )

Jeff Davis wrote:
> Clearly, there is a huge difference in the overall application. The
> PostgreSQL entry was done quickly, and the author probably didn't
> understand the terms of the contest entirely, let alone have the time
> to optimize his entry.

I don't think you should make these kinds of insulting judgements
without research.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-advocacy by date:

From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: database contest results
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.4 Development