Re: database contest results

From: Jeff Davis
Subject: Re: database contest results
Date: ,
Msg-id: 1156874131.13414.10.camel@dogma.v10.wvs
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: database contest results  (Peter Eisentraut)
Responses: Re: database contest results  ("Joshua D. Drake")
Re: database contest results  (Jeff Davis)
Re: database contest results  (Andreas Pflug)
List: pgsql-advocacy

Tree view

database contest results  (Lukas Kahwe Smith, )
 [ignore this and previous email] Re: database contest results  (Lukas Kahwe Smith, )
 Re: database contest results  (Hans-Juergen Schoenig, )
  Re: database contest results  (Andreas Pflug, )
   Re: database contest results  (Anastasios Hatzis, )
  Re: database contest results  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
  Re: database contest results  (Jeff Davis, )
   Re: database contest results  (Peter Eisentraut, )
    Re: database contest results  (Jeff Davis, )
     Re: database contest results  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
     Re: database contest results  (Jeff Davis, )
     Re: database contest results  (Andreas Pflug, )
      Re: database contest results  (Jeff Davis, )
       Re: database contest results  (Andreas Pflug, )
       Re: database contest results  (mdean, )
        Re: database contest results  (Josh Berkus, )
        Re: database contest results  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
        Re: database contest results  (Brian Hurt, )
 Re: database contest results  (Chris Browne, )
  Re: database contest results  (Andreas Pflug, )

On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 19:20 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Jeff Davis wrote:
> > Clearly, there is a huge difference in the overall application. The
> > PostgreSQL entry was done quickly, and the author probably didn't
> > understand the terms of the contest entirely, let alone have the time
> > to optimize his entry.
>
> I don't think you should make these kinds of insulting judgements
> without research.
>

The author himself said he didn't have time. I didn't mean to be
insulting, and I apologize if I was. 120 versus 3000 seems like the
MySQL entry guys were operating with an entirely separate set of
assumptions, and spent much more time optimizing it and determining the
exact contest requirements.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




pgsql-advocacy by date:

From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: database contest results
From: Chris Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: database contest results