Is anyone working on this? Marc? If not, who can make these
modifications to the archive numbering?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > When Marc fixed the message-boundary pattern and regenerated the
> > archives, many of the existing messages changed URLs because they
> > got assigned slightly different numbers. I notice that the archive
> > search engine hasn't yet tracked this change --- if you do a search
> > and click on a link to a message, you'll arrive at a message close
> > to the one you want but probably not quite it.
> >
> > Regenerating the archive indexes is presumably not hard, but there's
> > a bigger problem: for awhile now many of us have been in the habit
> > of citing old discussions by archive URLs. All those links are now
> > broken too, and I can't think of any easy way to fix them. And then
> > there's Google etc.
> >
> > I wonder if it'd be better to revert the regeneration of the archives,
> > and only apply the new message-boundary pattern to future messages.
>
> Agreed. There have been no changes since we discussed this.
>
> The best proposal was to renumber the newly-found items to the end of
> the numeric range for the pre-July 2006 archives, and to properly number
> July 2006 and later archives. And this date range has to be enbedded in
> the archive script so if it is ever run again, this behavior continues
> to happen.
>
> The longer we take to fix this, the more likely that people are creating
> URL's that refer to the existing pre-July 2006 numbering which should
> change. It needs to be fixed quickly.
>
> And we can't just leave it alone because old archive emails have URLs
> that point to now-incorrect numbers, and there is no good way to fix
> that everywhere are emails are archived.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
