Re: Mail archive indexes are broken, URLs too - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Mail archive indexes are broken, URLs too |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20060809141747.C7267@ganymede.hub.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Mail archive indexes are broken, URLs too (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Responses |
Re: Mail archive indexes are broken, URLs too
|
List | pgsql-www |
Just shutdown rsync while I rebuild the archives for the 'old/new' scheme, where old is pre-July 2006 ... will post once its been all rebuilt ... On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Is anyone working on this? Marc? If not, who can make these > modifications to the archive numbering? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> When Marc fixed the message-boundary pattern and regenerated the >>> archives, many of the existing messages changed URLs because they >>> got assigned slightly different numbers. I notice that the archive >>> search engine hasn't yet tracked this change --- if you do a search >>> and click on a link to a message, you'll arrive at a message close >>> to the one you want but probably not quite it. >>> >>> Regenerating the archive indexes is presumably not hard, but there's >>> a bigger problem: for awhile now many of us have been in the habit >>> of citing old discussions by archive URLs. All those links are now >>> broken too, and I can't think of any easy way to fix them. And then >>> there's Google etc. >>> >>> I wonder if it'd be better to revert the regeneration of the archives, >>> and only apply the new message-boundary pattern to future messages. >> >> Agreed. There have been no changes since we discussed this. >> >> The best proposal was to renumber the newly-found items to the end of >> the numeric range for the pre-July 2006 archives, and to properly number >> July 2006 and later archives. And this date range has to be enbedded in >> the archive script so if it is ever run again, this behavior continues >> to happen. >> >> The longer we take to fix this, the more likely that people are creating >> URL's that refer to the existing pre-July 2006 numbering which should >> change. It needs to be fixed quickly. >> >> And we can't just leave it alone because old archive emails have URLs >> that point to now-incorrect numbers, and there is no good way to fix >> that everywhere are emails are archived. >> >> -- >> Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us >> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com >> >> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org > > -- > Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > > + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664