----- Original Message ----
>From: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
>To: Shelby Cain <alyandon@yahoo.com>
>Cc: Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>; SCassidy@overlandstorage.com; Postgres >general mailing list
<pgsql-general@postgresql.org>;pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
>Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 5:19:58 PM
>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] allow LIMIT in UPDATE and DELETE
>
>The issue is that vacuum has to base it's decisions not on the oldest
>running transaction that has locks on a table, but on the oldest running
>transaction in the entire database, because that transaction could start
>reading any table at any time. Until that changes, long-running
>transactions of any kind and heavy-update tables simply won't mix well
>at all in a single database.
Now I understand... thanks for the clarification.
Regards,
Shelby Cain
