Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay. - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay.
Date
Msg-id 20060504122747.GA21437@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay.  (Chris Mckenzie <Chris.McKenzie@entrust.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:47:15PM -0400, Chris Mckenzie wrote:
> I've come to the conclusion I need to simply start tracking all transactions
> and determining a cost/performance for the larger and frequently updated
> tables without the benefit and penalty of pg_statio.

I'll bet it won't help you.  If you can't get off 7.4 on a busy
machine, you're going to get hosed by I/O sometimes no matter what.
My suggestion is to write a bunch of rule-of-thumb rules for your
cron jobs, and start planning your upgrade.

Jan back-patched the vacuum stuff to 7.4 for us (Afilias), and we
tried playing with it; but it didn't really make the difference we'd
hoped.

The reason for this is that 7.4 also doesn't have the bg_writer.  So
you're still faced with I/O storms, no matter what you do.  If I were
in your shoes, I wouldn't waste a lot of time on trying to emulate
the new features in 7.4.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
                --Brad Holland

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Stone
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow restoration question
Next
From: Chris Mckenzie
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay.