Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT
Date
Msg-id 200601061746.k06Hk1V13082@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > FYI, SQL03 defines GRANT SEQUENCE.
>
> Oh.  Well, then that gives us precedent to go by.  What do they specify
> as the privileges for sequences?

They don't seem to specify which actions go with which objects in the
GRANT statement, nor do they specify what permissions should control the
nextval-style statements.  Seems like something they should have
specified.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT
Next
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT