On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:37:26PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> I don't know which locales are affected. It just can't be that
> widespread because we're not getting similar reports for 99% of the
> locales out there.
Not getting reports doesn't mean the problem is rare.
Perhaps people moved to another database. Perhaps people
decided to solve their problem in client code. Perhaps 50%
of all potential locales haven't been put to use with
PostgreSQL such that the problem showed up.
It's definitely worth doing something about. Had I the
skills would I myself help with it.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
