Re: PL/php in pg_pltemplate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: PL/php in pg_pltemplate
Date
Msg-id 200511251928.11813.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/php in pg_pltemplate  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: PL/php in pg_pltemplate  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Unless I missed something PLphp will be able to be in core (once it
> is all cleaned up). At least
> that was the last consensus that I read. My understanding was that it
> just wouldn't compile
> by default?

Well, either you missed something or I missed something. :-)

The last proposal I heard was that we move all core languages a bit 
farther away from the core and then add hitherto-non-core languages at 
that same level.  This would possibly mean that these languages become 
their own CVS module but in the same CVS tree, and we'd release them 
all at the same time as the server release but in separate source 
packages.  This will resolve all concerns about bit/interface rot, 
circular build dependencies, and you'd get no more objection from me 
about pltemplate.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept