Re: Read/Write block sizes - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Read/Write block sizes
Date
Msg-id 20050824205744.GX96732@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Read/Write block sizes  (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>)
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:12:22PM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> Everyone involved in development seems to me to have a reasonably keen
> understanding as to what the potential benefits of threading are; the
> value is that there fall out plenty of opportunities to parallelize
> the evaluation of portions of queries.  Alas, it wouldn't be until
> *after* all the effort goes in that we would get any idea as to what
> kinds of speedups this would provide.

My understanding is that the original suggestion was to use threads
within individual backends to allow for parallel query execution, not
swiching to a completely thread-based model.

In any case, there are other ways to enable parallelism without using
threads, such as handing actual query execution off to a set of
processes.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software        http://pervasive.com        512-569-9461

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Stone
Date:
Subject: Re: Caching by Postgres
Next
From: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Date:
Subject: Re: Caching by Postgres