Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] O_DIRECT for WAL writes - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Mark Wong
Subject Re: [HACKERS] O_DIRECT for WAL writes
Date
Msg-id 200508112031.j7BKVFjA003387@smtp.osdl.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] O_DIRECT for WAL writes  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] O_DIRECT for WAL writes  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tree view 
Ok, I finally got a couple of tests done against CVS from Aug 3, 2005.
I'm not sure if I'm showing anything insightful though.  I've learned
that fdatasync and O_DSYNC are simply fsync and O_SYNC respectively on
Linux, which you guys may have already known.  There appears to be a
fair performance decrease in using open_sync.  Just to double check, am
I correct in understanding only open_sync uses O_DIRECT?

fdatasync
http://www.testing.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-015/38/
5462 notpm

open_sync
http://www.testing.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-015/40/
4860 notpm

Mark

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] O_DIRECT for WAL writes