Re: Conventions for release numbering - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Conventions for release numbering
Date
Msg-id 200506140948.11442.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Conventions for release numbering  (Brian Kilpatrick <briank@sraapowergres.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Brian,

> Of course, in the course of numbering of other products/projects its
> usually not the first 2 numbers that indicate an ersatz major release.
> They tend to stick to major.minor.other. Postgres 'seems' to do
> major1.major2.revision.

Actually, major1.major2.revision is consistent with several other OSS
projects, such as Linux, Apache, and BSD.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Conventions for release numbering
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: O.k. OSCON -- call for SWAG