Select performance vs. mssql - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From mark durrant
Subject Select performance vs. mssql
Date
Msg-id 20050524054715.3988.qmail@web53106.mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Select performance vs. mssql  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi,

I have some experience with MSSQL and am examining
PostgreSQL. I'm running under Windows. I like what I
see so far, but I'm hoping for some performance
advice:

1. My test database has 7 million records.
2. There are two columns - an integer and a char
column called Day which has a random value of Mon or
Tues, etc. in it.
3. I made an index on Day.

My query is:

select count(*) from mtable where day='Mon'

Results:

1. P3 600 512MB RAM MSSQL. It takes about 4-5 secs to
run. If I run a few queries and everything is cached,
it is sometimes  just 1 second.

2. Athlon 1.3 Ghz 1GB RAM. PostgreSQL takes 7 seconds.
I have played with the buffers setting and currently
have it at 7500. At 20000 it took over 20 seconds to
run.

5 seconds vs 7 isn't that big of a deal, but 1 second
vs 7 seconds is. Also, the slower performance is with
much lesser hardware.

Any ideas to try?

Thanks much,
Mark

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Anjan Dave"
Date:
Subject: Re: seqential vs random io
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Select performance vs. mssql