Re: Inline PL/pgSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Inline PL/pgSQL
Date
Msg-id 20050509194350.GE2316@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Inline PL/pgSQL  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jharris@tvi.edu>)
Responses Re: Inline PL/pgSQL
Re: Inline PL/pgSQL
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:44:23AM -0600, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> 
> In addition to package support in plpgsql, it would be really handy
> to have inline plpgsql.  Likewise, I think there are others who feel
> this way as-well.

Why yes, there are. :)

> Years ago, Oracle merged PL/SQL with their normal SQL parser which
> allowed for inline PL/SQL.  They did this because it was difficult
> to maintain two separate parsers.  While this worked great for
> Oracle, it probably wouldn't really work as well for PostgreSQL
> because pgsql supports multiple procedural languages.

I proposed a syntax for this awhile back.  I haven't found it in the
archives, but it goes like this:

EXECUTE IMMEDIATE $$   function body here
$$
LANGUAGE plfoo;

Similarly, a CREATE TEMPORARY FUNCTION could be quite handy.

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100   mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we get patents?