Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
Date
Msg-id 200501250858.37157.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL  ("Peter Darley" <pdarley@kinesis-cem.com>)
Responses Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
List pgsql-performance
Peter, Ragnar,

> > Are there ones that you use which might use several different connections
> > to send a series of queries from a single web-user, less than 5 seconds
> > apart?
>
>     Using Apache/Perl I often have a situation where we're sending several
> queries from the same user (web client) within seconds, or even
> simultaneously, that use different connections.

So from the sound of it, the connection methods I've been using are the
exception rather than the rule.   Darn, it worked well for us.  :-(

What this would point to is NOT being able to use Slony-I for database server
pooling for most web applications.   Yes?  Users should look to pgCluster and
C-JDBC instead.

BTW, Tatsuo, what's the code relationship between pgPool and pgCluster, if
any?

--Josh

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Peter Darley"
Date:
Subject: Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
Next
From: Randolf Richardson
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft