Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Randolf Richardson
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date
Msg-id Xns95E5585E37E01rr8xca@200.46.204.72
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft  (Randolf Richardson <rr@8x.ca>)
List pgsql-performance
"Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>" wrote in pgsql.performance:

> I sometimes also think it's fun to point out that Postgresql
> bigger companies supporting it's software - like this one:
>
> http://www.fastware.com.au/docs/FujitsuSupportedPostgreSQLWhitePaper.pdf
>
> with $43 billion revenue -- instead of those little companies
> like Mysql AB or Oracle.
>
>  :)

        Heheh.  That is a good point indeed.  When the illogical "everyone else
is doing it" argument comes along (as typically does whenever someone is
pushing for a Microsoft solution), then this will be very helpful.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
Next
From: Randolf Richardson
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft