On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:39:28AM -0800, J. Greenlees wrote:
> why?
> since an app that I'm working on would be useless for 60% of potential
> clients, using posgresql with the requirement for ms' corrupted ntfs
> means postgresql isn't going to work for it.
I think what you are referring to is the installer refusing to install
on a NTFS partition. From the FAQ:
http://pginstaller.projects.postgresql.org/FAQ_windows.html
2.4) Can I install PostgreSQL on a FAT partition?
PostgreSQL's number one priority is the integrity of your data. FAT and
FAT32 filesystems simply do not offer the reliabilty required to allow
this. In addition, the lack of security features offered by FAT make it
impossible to secure the raw data files from unauthorised modification.
Finally, PostgreSQL utilises a feature called 'reparse points' to
implement tablespaces. This feature is not available on FAT partitions.
<snip>
It is recognised however, that on some systems such as developer's PCs,
FAT partitions may be the only choice. In such cases, you can simply
install PostgreSQL as normal, but without initialising the database
cluster. When the installation has finished, manually run the
'initdb.exe' program on the FAT partition. Security and reliability
will be compromised however, and any attempts to create tablespaces
will fail.
> since ms does not include a compiler, and the source for 8.0 won't cross
> compile from linux. ( gcc 3.3.0 )
To compile the native port on Windows you need MinGW. And there's
always the Cygwin port still. See:
http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/faqs/text/FAQ_MINGW
Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
