Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6?
Date
Msg-id 20042.1481653357@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6?
List pgsql-general
I wrote:
> Yup, sure looks like a bug to me, especially since it seems to work as
> expected before 9.5.  No idea offhand what broke it.

The answer is, I broke it, through some ill-advised neatnik-ism :-(,
ie clearing a field I thought would be unused but it wasn't.

Fix pushed.  Thanks for the report!

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] CRM where pg is a first class citizen?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump and quoted identifiers