Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Torsten Förtsch
Subject Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6?
Date
Msg-id CAKkG4_ns-_88Rin7rShKDCxcNeb7xgXaydsrF3hQ0poY2jHBeg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] is this a known bug in 9.6?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Thanks Tom

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I wrote:
> Yup, sure looks like a bug to me, especially since it seems to work as
> expected before 9.5.  No idea offhand what broke it.

The answer is, I broke it, through some ill-advised neatnik-ism :-(,
ie clearing a field I thought would be unused but it wasn't.

Fix pushed.  Thanks for the report!

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump and quoted identifiers
Next
From: Torsten Förtsch
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] vacuum freeze in 96