On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 02:06:24 +0200,
Ciprian Popovici <ciprian@zuavra.net> wrote:
> I'm in a situation where it would be useful to bind a field in a table via
> foreign keys to N other tables simultaneously. The table holds a common
> type of info which all those other tables use. The many tables refer to the
> common table by keeping references to its serial field.
>
> By doing this, I could ensure that when a row in any of the many tables is
> deleted or updated, the effect travels to the common table.
>
> So far, I've been successful in defining more than one foreign key on the
> same field in the lone table, tied to fields in different tables. (I half
> expected it not to work though).
>
> However, it seems that inserting values in the commons table is a
> showstopper: it expects that field value to exists not in only one, but in
> ALL bound tables simultaneously.
Are you sure you don't really want the foreign key relation to go in the
other direction?
