Re: Corrupt RTREE index - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: Corrupt RTREE index
Date
Msg-id 87acshv3mh.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Corrupt RTREE index  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> > So you don't think this case is worth doing forensics on?
>
> If the problem goes away after REINDEX then I'll write it off as missing
> WAL support.  rtree is not high enough on my list of priorities to
> justify more effort :-(

Fwiw, the problem went away after REINDEX.

--
greg

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple foreign keys on same field
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple foreign keys on same field