Robert,
> I am current leaning toward making a new menu item called "advocacy"
> and renaming the overview/about section to "community". With that here is
> how I see the content breaking down into those two sections:
I think this is overall a very good idea. However, I think it should be
called "about" and not "advocacy". "about" is a web industry convention, and
new people know to automatically go to "about" for stuff like press links,
supporters, contact info, etc.
Some comments below.
> members{a}
Doesn't this duplicate the developer site portion?
> corporate{a}
We'll need to come up with some rules on who can appear here. My thoughts:
1) Anyone who sponsors a full-time or 1/2 time developer;
2) Anyone who has sponsored a significant feature in the last 3 versions.
3) Anyone who contributed/runs an add-in project in recent use.
> advantages{a}
> case studies{a}
> requestinfo{a}
Definitely keep this. I'll want to revise the form, but I currently get 5-10
e-mails a day. It's been very useful.
> presskit{u}
Which means I need to work on a general, non-version-specific presskit, eh?
Give me some time after 8.0.
> license{a}
>
> community/
> users{ex}
What is this?
> store{ex}
> donate{ex}
> books{u}
> related projects{u}
> interfacing to postgresql{u}
> [docs]
> [support]
Hmmm ... won't documentation be a top-level category?
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
