Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...
Date
Msg-id 200410181400.45005.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Tree view 
Simon,

> I agree that you could test this by running on a bigger or smaller server,
> i.e. one with more or less RAM. Running on a faster/slower server at the
> same time might alter the results and confuse the situation.

Unfortunately, a faster server is the only option I have that also has more
RAM.   If I double the RAM and double the processors at the same time, what
would you expect to happen to the shared_buffers curve?

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general]
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...)