At 2004-09-20 11:02:50 -0400, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
>
> (1) What about preparing an unnamed statement ...
stmtName == "" will work.
> (2) What about discovering the actually resolved parameter types?
I'm not sure what to do about that.
I could extend PGresult to hold ParameterDescription information, then
provide accessor functions à la PQnfields/PQfformat. But that would be
a fairly intrusive change. And I shudder to even think about trying to
reuse the existing PGresult fields/accessors to do the job.
Do you have any suggestions?
-- ams
